We need facts,not spin,in the climate debate –Telegraph Telegraph View:the case that global warming is man-made needs to be constantly tested and credible ….Mr Booker and others have been enormously energetic in pointing out the …[...]
| |||||
We need facts,not spin,in the climate debate –Telegraph Telegraph View:the case that global warming is man-made needs to be constantly tested and credible ….Mr Booker and others have been enormously energetic in pointing out the …[...] Telegraph Praises “Others”in Climategate . We need facts,not spin,in the climate debate –Telegraph. Telegraph View:the case that global warming is man-made needs to be constantly tested and credible …[...] BBC News Still more doubt cast on global warming “science”Beaufort Observer There is yet another story out that casts more. [...] Scientists have found a new threat to the planet:Canadian beer drinkers. The government-commissioned study says the old,inefficient beer fridges that one. [...] Unfortunately we have to get the latest news on the global warming scam from the Brits as American newspapers are no where to be found. From the Telegraph:Amazongate:new evidence of the IPCC’s failures …[...] In its most recent report,it stated that observed reductions in mountain ice in the Andes,Alps and Africa was being caused by global warming ,citing two papers as the source of the information. However,it can be revealed that one of …[...] Regional-level carbon trading “is where the action is going to be” this year,Bill Becker,executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies,which represents state and local environmental regulators,…[...] The sweeping bill to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions that moved through Congress over the last year received relatively scant media attention,taking a distant back seat to the healthcare reform bill and its attendant public uproar. [...] With all the evidence of falsified data concerning Global Warming ,it has become obvious…. Global Warming is the official religion of stupid people. [...] This comment from an article at the UK Independent caught my eye:A Clear Conflict of Interest andrew160 wrote:Monday,1 February 2010 at 01:11 am (UTC) This might help explain the AGW bias of the BBC,the Environment Agency,…[...] | |||||